A fictional portrayal of an aging revolutionary, this novel is a powerful commentary on the nightmare politics of the troubled 20th century. Born in Hungary in 1905, a defector from the Communist Party in 1938, and then arrested in both Spain and France for his political views, Arthur Koestler writes from a wealth of personal experience. Imprisoned by the political party to which he has dedicated his life, Nicolas Rubashov paces his prison cell, examining his life and remembering his tempestuous career. As the old intelligentsia is eradicated to make way for the new, he is psychologically tortured and forced to confess to preposterous crimes. Comparing himself to Moses, led to the Promised Land but refused entry, he sees only darkness at the end of his life where once he saw such promise for humanity. Frank Muller's narrative expertise is perfect for this haunting work. Rubashov's personal agony becomes Muller's as he presents Koestler's relevant and important questions to a world entering a new millennium.
Download and start listening now!
"I looked forward to this with great anticipation after all that I had heard of the novel and the author. It didn't disappoint either. The story is of a man who is destroyed by the government that he helped to create. The reference is to the many officials killed by Stalin during the Great Purge and Show Trials. Koestler doesn't mention Stalin by name, nor the USSR. The similarities though are too obvious to be missed. Koestler performs wonderfully in describing the protagonist's struggles to endure the sufferings, physical and mental, and to try to hold out without giving the interrogators what they want. The ending is well done though predictable. Predictable doesn't mean boring or anti-climatic. Koestler's novel doesn't fade off but maintains a fine level of tension though to the foreseeable end. Wonderfully done."
— Bur (5 out of 5 stars)
“It is the sort of novel that transcends ordinary limitations. Written with such dramatic power, with such warmth of feeling, and with such persuasive simplicity that it is as absorbing as melodrama.”
— New York Times Book Review“One of the few books written in this epoch which will survive it.”
— New Statesman (London)“A rare and beautifully executed novel.”
— New York Herald Tribune“A remarkable book. A grimly fascinating interpretation of the logic of the Russian revolution, indeed of all revolutionary dictatorships, and at the same time a tense and subtly intellectualized drama.”
— Times Literary Supplement (London)" I've downloaded this audiobook because Eckhart Tolle mentioned it in one of his talks so I had high hopes for it. And it certainly met my expectations. Would not recommend listening to it late at night though, as it happened to me a few times that I'd fallen asleep while listening, only to then wake up in the middle of the night and hear an intense conversation from a prison setting - it can be quite unsettling at times :) "
— Andrea, 9/18/2016" Interesting and insightful but deeply flawed in its concept and examination of the communist morale, ethics and philosophy. Not to say that from the purely historical viewpoint it's so unauthentic and primitive in exposing pre- and post- revolutionary history of the Russian communist movement that it's not even funny. Koestler surely knew something about it so it's quite a surprise for me that he chose to write on these topics in such a simplistic and inadequate manner - well, it's not a historical trait so some degree of fantasy and even mixing things a bit is, of course, tolerable but the book's extreme remoteness from the historicism is annoying for a person who knows some basics about those times. Maybe the author intended to combine some very interesting and deep reflections on historical materialism, pain and suffering (both physical and spiritual), betrayal and the contradiction between the duty and the sense of guilt and humaneness with such a vulgar simplifications and misrepresentations in order to make his novel (otherwise too abstruse, abstract and intellectually demanding for an average reader) more light-minded and easy-going or the obvious agitprop literature limitations (of which this book is a perfect example despite its depth and non-triviality) left their ugly traces but this creates a very mixed feeling. More detailed review to follow (as I don't want to sound proofless). "
— Alexei, 2/19/2014" A great intellectual dialogue of conscience. Slow and deliberate pacing lends an intense thoughtfulness. So much to ruminate upon... "
— Daniel, 2/16/2014" The ending is kind of explicit about the moralising, but it still avoids easy answers and asks questions related to the actual Soviet experience that's far more realistic and interesting than 1984's "they just want power for the sake of it. bad people" thing. The conversations between Ivanov and Rubashov are pretty fascinating as elucidations of common guiding principles - both in the Soviet movement and outside of it - the problems with them re ideas of humanity and the problems with those ideas. The book also talks about the problems of collaboration and resistance. Not a perfect book but a step up from a lot of "dystopian" novels by focusing on real circumstances and reasons why people do things. "
— Tombom, 2/15/2014" I found this story fascinating from the perspective of what I would do if I was in a similar situation. There was a great blend of present events with backstory that lead to those events. Finally, the ending was one of the best in its conveyance of a unique situation and conclusion to a good story. "
— Rob, 2/15/2014" Re-reading this book that I haven't opened since freshmen year of college. "
— Beth, 2/14/2014" This made a huge impact on me when I read it 20 years ago. I don't know how it would like it now, it has been interesting to read other people's reactions on this site. My memory of it makes it one of my favourites. "
— Don, 2/4/2014" The horrors of having what you believed in and helped build come back to end you. "
— Jason, 2/1/2014" Now this is real horror. "
— Scottish, 1/31/2014" Bleak depiction of totalitarianism and the total control of individuals. Gripping. "
— Jeff, 1/27/2014" i don't like this book as much as other people seem to (especially according to great book lists etc.) but i've enjoyed reading it so far. "
— behemothing, 1/25/2014Arthur Koestler (1905–1983) was a Hungarian-British author and journalist. Koestler was born in Budapest and, apart from his early school years, was educated in Austria. In 1931 Koestler joined the Communist Party of Germany until, disillusioned by Stalinism, he resigned in 1938. A few years later, he published his novel Darkness at Noon, an anti-totalitarian work, which gained him international fame. Over the next forty-three years from his residence in Great Britain, Koestler espoused many political causes and wrote novels, memoirs, biographies, and essays. He was awarded the Sonning Prize for outstanding contribution to European culture and was made a Commander of the Order of the British Empire.
Frank Muller (1951–2008) was an Audie Award–winning narrator. A classically trained actor, Frank appeared on both television and the stage. His credits include Hamlet, The Crucible, The Taming of the Shrew, The Importance of Being Earnest, Law & Order, All My Children, and many, many more. In 1999 Frank was awarded the AudioFile Lifetime Achievement Award, the top honor in the audiobook community. He has also won twenty-three Earphones Awards.