Wolves in Chic Clothing: A Novel Audiobook

" Kind of a hoaky book, but good for a quick read. "

" Purely fun read- love to imagine the high-faluten life in NYC! "

" This book was very poorly written. The beginning of it was so unrealistic that I nearly stopped. Even for "chick lit," it wasn't good! "

" This isn't going to set the world on fire as a literary masterpiece- but it's a fun easy read. "

" This book was mediocre and shallow. Unless you "

" Fun book. I loved how the book went back and forth between perspectives. Although it is a little predictable, I still enjoyed it and couldn't put it down! "

" What I would describe as fairly typical chic lit - light and easy. Peaks into the upper crust of the New York social scene. "

" Another just to pass the time book someone suggested. It was OK, not great. "

" Good "chic lit" about NYC. "

" Total escapist "reading". A light story read by a good reader. A rags-to-riches-to-rags-to-riches tale. "

" couldn't put it down quite entertaining as an inbetween read "

" Chick lit wins me over again. Although not incredibly good chick lit. It was well-written in that I hated who I was supposed to hate and liked who I was supposed to like. I don't remember why I rented this, but thankfully, it was short, and not a chunk of my life I'll never get back. "

" A little too superficial even for my chic-lit tolerance level - sort of low rent Devil Wears Prada "

" It was a nice quick read... A little predictable, but i still enjoyed it. "

" Ridiculously stupid. Main Character had no personality. "

" If you read the summary on the back cover, you've read the whole book. Small town girl makes good, loses it all, and makes good again. It's a quick read and not a bad way to spend your time while in a doctor's waiting room, but it's not a book that you can't wait to pick up again. "

" Probably some of the best chic-lit I have read. Though I don't know if that is saying much. "

" A good fluff summer read. "

" Quick read - fun and a bit too predictable. For better takes on chick-lit, try Jane Green and Sophie Kinsella. "

" Drama, drama , drama and a New York City socialite setting. "

" 2.5 stars. I normally love chic lit. And this one had some good, funny parts. But overall, it was too disconnected. Not my favorite. "

" One of the worst books ever written. It was sloppy. "

" One of the first books i read ! I loved it <3 "

" Fun way to pass the time. "

" I didn't finish this book, so my rating is skewed. This book was pretty shallow for me, even for a girl who likes shallow once in awhile. It wasn't worth my time. "

" This was mildly entertaining—a once-a-year indulgence into chic lit—a gap-fill between more thought-provocing literature. "

" Total escapist &quot;reading&quot;. A light story read by a good reader. A rags-to-riches-to-rags-to-riches tale. "

" It was a nice quick read... A little predictable, but i still enjoyed it. "

" This book was mediocre and shallow. Unless you?re really interested in the New York A list, you probably won?t get a ton out of this read. "

" This book tried way too hard to be cute/funny/hip. I almost gave it a rating of three because I didn't expect much out of it from the beginning but the authors misused the word &quot;literally&quot; way too frequently. Come on, you're writers! "

" Another just to pass the time book someone suggested. It was OK, not great. "

" This book was very poorly written. The beginning of it was so unrealistic that I nearly stopped. Even for &quot;chick lit,&quot; it wasn't good! "

" Quick read - fun and a bit too predictable. For better takes on chick-lit, try Jane Green and Sophie Kinsella. "