close
The Magnificent Ambersons Audiobook, by Booth Tarkington Play Audiobook Sample

The Magnificent Ambersons Audiobook

The Magnificent Ambersons Audiobook, by Booth Tarkington Play Audiobook Sample
FlexPass™ Price: $12.95
$9.95 for new members!
(Includes UNLIMITED podcast listening)
  • Love your audiobook or we'll exchange it
  • No credits to manage, just big savings
  • Unlimited podcast listening
Add to Cart
$9.95/m - cancel anytime - 
learn more
OR
Regular Price: $19.95 Add to Cart
Read By: Geoffrey Blaisdell Publisher: Blackstone Publishing Listen Time: at 1.0x Speed 6.33 hours at 1.5x Speed 4.75 hours at 2.0x Speed Release Date: January 2006 Format: Unabridged Audiobook ISBN: 9781481582261

Quick Stats About this Audiobook

Total Audiobook Chapters:

35

Longest Chapter Length:

27:51 minutes

Shortest Chapter Length:

08:46 minutes

Average Chapter Length:

16:27 minutes

Audiobooks by this Author:

7

Other Audiobooks Written by Booth Tarkington: > View All...

Publisher Description

Winner of the 1919 Pulitzer Prize when it was first published, The Magnificent Ambersons chronicles the changing fortunes of three generations of an American dynasty. The family serves as a metaphor for the old society that crumbled after the Industrial Revolution while a middle-western town spread and darkened into a city.

George Amberson Minafer is the spoiled and arrogant grandson of the founder of the family's magnificence. George, eclipsed by a new breed of industrial tycoons and land developers whose power comes not through family connections but through financial dealings and modern manufacturing, descends from the Midwestern aristocracy to the working class. But George refuses to accept his diminishing status, clinging to all the superficiality he has always known.

As the wheels of industry transform the social landscape, the definitions of ambition, success, and loyalty also change.

Download and start listening now!

"More than a view into the lives that create a family, and friends that come into view. It is a story about 'progress', in terms of time and change. Also, a cautionary tale of pride and the consequences of a refusal to 'adapt' one's perceptions or behavior even after bearing witness to changes around them. The lesson for me....recognize perceptions, and allow for changes in perspective. Dug it."

— Karen (4 out of 5 stars)

Quotes

  • “An admirable study of character and of American life.”

    — New York Times
  • “The 1919 Pulitzer Prize-winning novel portrays the decline of the superrich Amberson family, who act as a metaphor for the old society that crumbled after the Industrial Revolution. All fiction collections should own a copy, and all video collections should include Orson Welles’s 1942 film version.”

    — Library Journal
  • “Geoffrey Blaisdell gives proper blue-blood intonation to the Amberson clan and their contemporaries. He also gives appropriate tones to the servants and the townspeople.”

    — AudioFile
  • “It is a view of Indianapolis’ evolution from a major marketing center to a great industrial city. It adds a new dimension to one’s understanding of the coming of the Industrial Age.”

    — Herman B Wells, Indiana University
  • “This novel no doubt was a permanent page in the social history of the United States, so admirably conceived and written was the tale of the Ambersons, their house, their fate and the growth of the community in which they were submerged in the end.”

    — Van Wyck Brooks, literary critic, biographer, and, historian

Awards

  • Winner of the 1919 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction
  • One of the Modern Library's 100 Best English-Language Novels of the Twentieth Century

The Magnificent Ambersons Listener Reviews

Overall Performance: 3.5 out of 53.5 out of 53.5 out of 53.5 out of 53.5 out of 5 (3.50)
5 Stars: 8
4 Stars: 20
3 Stars: 10
2 Stars: 8
1 Stars: 2
Narration: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 (0.00)
5 Stars: 0
4 Stars: 0
3 Stars: 0
2 Stars: 0
1 Stars: 0
Story: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 (0.00)
5 Stars: 0
4 Stars: 0
3 Stars: 0
2 Stars: 0
1 Stars: 0
Write a Review
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " A classic and one of the most interesting books I've ever read. It's a story that has stuck with me for years. I'd highly recommend this book. "

    — Emily, 2/19/2014
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Interesting and thoughtful protrayal of aristocrats coming to terms with mediocrity. "

    — Britt, 2/11/2014
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " I enjoyed this story. Parts about urban sprawl made me think of my own Some of the insults used in the book certainly wouldn't have been known to be insults since they are certainly period related. A worthwhile read. "

    — Judy, 2/9/2014
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Reminiscent of Great Gatsby; fall from prosperity of a heartbreaking-ly spoiled child and subsequent rise into decency. "

    — Cayley, 2/8/2014
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " The writing kept me engaged more than the story, at first, because the main character is so arrogant. The story takes an unexpected turn, though, and the main character becomes more interesting. The use of a medium as a plot device, though, made the ending less satisfying to me --her role was unnecessary and contrived, not to mention creepy. Still better than most modern novels! "

    — Kristi, 2/6/2014
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " I really think it was a good book thought nothing really happened in the book. "

    — Marianna, 2/4/2014
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " The book was written in the early '20s but the themes are not dated. Experience is a great teacher, over indulgence of children is not good for their character, forgiveness is soul satisfying. Forgiveness is such an easy concept until we are called upon to use it. The value of an individual based on stratification of who has money in society is a worthless measure of judgment. "

    — Dawn, 1/30/2014
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " An excellent picture of a midwestern city growing and yet declining at the same time with the comimng of the industrialization of the United States is somewhat spoiled by a rather lame ending. The author forces a saccherine redemption onto the main character, who had been a prize ass for three-quarters of the story. Other major characters are unbelievable in their goodness. However, the mother and many of the minor characters are completely believable. A mixed bag here. You may like it, or it may be a wall-banger for you. "

    — Gail, 1/27/2014
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Story of a family going into decline as the town outgrows them. "

    — Stephanie, 1/22/2014
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " very good - not a very sympathetic "hero" but engaging account of wealthy and powerful dynasty in decline "

    — Derek, 1/19/2014
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " This is the 2nd PPW for 1919. Captures the times very well, filled with great color. "

    — Lynda, 1/12/2014
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " (Quick review, will update later) Won the Pulitzer Prize for the Novel in 1919. "

    — Sara, 12/13/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " This book won Pulitzer Prize for Novel in 1919. It truly is a masterpiece. "

    — Catherine, 12/6/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Interesting to learn about how time and change affect a town and a prominent family. "

    — Dawn, 11/20/2013
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Uncle George has a great talk with Georgie about gossip. One of the best passages I have ever read. Man Georgie really got his in the end. "

    — Ryan, 11/3/2013
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " This was written in 1916 and is the second in a Trilogy. It follows three generations of a well-to-do family through their demise. The theme is one of obsession with class and possessions and is predictable. I'm sure this was revolutionary in it's time but is tiresome today. "

    — Bobbi, 10/28/2013
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " I can always appreciate a book where I hate the main character. Georgie, you suck! "

    — Dy-an, 10/13/2013
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " An excellent picture of a midwestern city growing and yet declining at the same time with the comimng of the industrialization of the United States is somewhat spoiled by a rather lame ending. The author forces a saccherine redemption onto the main character, who had been a prize ass for three-quarters of the story. Other major characters are unbelievable in their goodness. However, the mother and many of the minor characters are completely believable. A mixed bag here. You may like it, or it may be a wall-banger for you. "

    — Gail, 10/12/2013
  • Overall Performance: 1 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Seriously...this book just about killed me! Between the rambling and unlikable characters I seriously wanted to cry. Not a favorite, clearly! "

    — Erin, 10/11/2013
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Another Pulitzer read. Didn't really find any redeeming qualities in this book. The main character was a jerk, the mother enabled his selfish behavior, the "romance" had no chemistry and the girl realized he was a jerk but dated him anyway. Then at the end he unbelievably completely turns his life around and becomes a good person? Some of the same themes as Alice Adams, but at least she was a more sympathetic character. Again, I just feel like the themes are too strong and the characters are so over done that they are almost caricatures. It would have been great if we had read this in high school - don't think I would have had any trouble writing an essay about it, but not my idea of a good novel. "

    — Sally, 9/19/2013
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Reminiscent of Great Gatsby; fall from prosperity of a heartbreaking-ly spoiled child and subsequent rise into decency. "

    — Cayley, 9/17/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " I didn't realize what a great book this is until the last word. This book was not at all about the Ambersons, but a much greater family. "

    — Mandi, 9/6/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " This was surprisingly a very good book. It reminded me of Emma a lot, but all in all, a quick and easy read. "

    — Christine, 8/30/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " the aspect that had to do with the automobile's effects on the city were the best part. it kept me entertained, despite being a bit corny at times. the ending could have been better. "

    — George, 8/24/2013
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Fantastic and at times cynical look at the growth of the Midwestern city at the turn of the 19th century. One of three stories in Growth collection (along with The Turmoil and National Avenue). "

    — Amanda, 8/9/2013
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " The Magnificent Ambersons is perhaps The "American" Novel. "

    — Nathan, 7/16/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " A real microcosmic view of New York City close to the turn of the century and the people who inhabited it. "

    — Evalyn, 2/23/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " The ending frustrated me..so oft is the case in life:) "

    — Tara, 2/16/2013
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " He got his come-uppance, in the end. "

    — Lindsey, 1/29/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Good story of family wealth, reputation, and the recklessness that takes all that away from the Ambersons. Don't think I need to read part 1 and 3 of this trilogy though. "

    — Inky, 10/29/2012
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Story of a family going into decline as the town outgrows them. "

    — Stephanie, 10/29/2012
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Story of brash, spoiled rich kid meanders a little, but the plot is original. Mystical ending makes a poignant statement about love. "

    — Joe, 10/17/2012
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " How did I miss this Pulitzer Prize winner all these years? In addition to the excellent characters and plot lines, the thought provoking themes made this a worthwhile and enjoyable read. "

    — Claudia, 9/5/2012
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Read this because it was on a list from Powell's. Interesting look at what happens when people choose not to change with the times ( even if those times were 100 years ago) "

    — Reema, 8/4/2012
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " So good, but so sad. "

    — Kate, 6/19/2012
  • Overall Performance: 1 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Tarkington once voted the greatest living novelist - while Joyce and Proust were in their heyday "

    — Steven, 6/10/2012
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " This was an excellantly written story of how the old world got left behind by the new industrial age. It is about how who you are became less important than what you do. a fun read "

    — Elizabeth, 5/15/2012
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " This is the 2nd PPW for 1919. Captures the times very well, filled with great color. "

    — Lynda, 4/29/2012
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Glad I finally read something from this fellow Hoosier. "

    — Tina, 12/31/2011
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Totally stupid ending to a wonderful story. "

    — Underhill, 10/13/2011
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " I didn't realize what a great book this is until the last word. This book was not at all about the Ambersons, but a much greater family. "

    — Mandi, 7/2/2011
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Pulitzer Prize #3. Having things and doing things seem to be mutually exclusive at the turn of the last century. Also, don't love your children for the sake of their existence, but for their actions. Otherwise, they will be horrible and selfish. "

    — Matthew, 4/30/2011
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " He got his come-uppance, in the end. "

    — Lindsey, 3/6/2011
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " He got his come-uppance, in the end. "

    — Lindsey, 3/6/2011
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Interestingly, both this book (second Pulitzer awarded) and the first Pulitzer winner contained, as a major plot point, a character being run over by an automobile. I feel like that's a sign of the times. It must have been a relatively common occurrence. "

    — Mackenzie, 3/1/2011
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Interestingly, both this book (second Pulitzer awarded) and the first Pulitzer winner contained, as a major plot point, a character being run over by an automobile. I feel like that's a sign of the times. It must have been a relatively common occurrence. "

    — Mackenzie, 3/1/2011
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " This novel is the story of a family and a town, tracing the fall from magnificence of the Amberson family, which coincides with the growth and industrialization of the town. "

    — Terry, 2/26/2011
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " This novel is the story of a family and a town, tracing the fall from magnificence of the Amberson family, which coincides with the growth and industrialization of the town. "

    — Terry, 2/26/2011

About Booth Tarkington

Booth Tarkington (1869–1946), who achieved overnight success with his first novel, The Gentleman from Indiana (1899), is perhaps best remembered as the author of the popular Penrod adventures and Seventeen. He was awarded two Pulitzer Prizes for Literature and in 1933 received the Gold Medal for Fiction from the American Academy of Arts and Letters.

About Geoffrey Blaisdell

Geoffrey Blaisdell is a professional actor who has appeared on and off Broadway, in Broadway national tours, and in regional theater.