" I agree with the premise of the book that we should be skeptical and not accept all things until we have persuasive proof and I found the first few chapters very enjoyable. However, that point is repeated so many times because the chapters are so small that it becomes more and more difficult to read. I would have enjoyed a book that contained less beliefs and went more in depth into explanations of the beliefs themselves and refuting those beliefs. There are some chapters that do this very well, but many just say something to the effect of there's no proof so I don't believe it. This ended up not really convincing me of much of anything. I think he did the best job of describing things like Area 51 and the Roswell UFOs very thoroughly, but when it came to abstract things like ghosts, angels, etc. both the evidence for and against was very sparse and instead substituted with person stories. I would recommend the book if you were planning on reading a few key chapters and not the whole book. "
— Jenny, 1/22/2014