" First I saw the film. Then I read the book. Then I saw the film again. The movie was better. It was an abridged version of the supposedly abridged Goldman version of the supposedly original S. Morgenstern book. The film is a two-layered story, Grandpa reading a book to a sick kid. The book he reads (and what the majority of the film is comprised of) is an epic tale of adventure, thrills, romance etc. etc. etc. The Goldman book is a multi-layered story of Goldman writing an abridgement of a book based on a book his father read to him as a child which he abridged as he was reading it because the original was rather too epic. And long-winded. Which is what Goldman's book turned out to be what with all the asides, details about the book contract, namedropping stories about famous people he's met and other famous and successful screenplays he's written, romance, thrills etc. etc. etc. The film tells the fairytale story. The book's story is diluted by telling the story of the author. If you like stories like that, then you'll like this book better than I did. "
— Greta, 12/27/2013