The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in America (Unabridged) Audiobook, by Michael J. Thompson Play Audiobook Sample

The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in America Audiobook (Unabridged)

The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in America (Unabridged) Audiobook, by Michael J. Thompson Play Audiobook Sample
Currently Unavailable
This audiobook is no longer available through the publisher and we don't know if or when it will become available again. Please check out similar audiobooks below, and click the "Vote this up!" button to let us know you're interested in this title. This audiobook has 0 votes
Read By: David Stampone Publisher: Caravan Listen Time: at 1.0x Speed 6.50 hours at 1.5x Speed 4.88 hours at 2.0x Speed Release Date: July 2009 Format: Unabridged Audiobook ISBN:

Publisher Description

Since the early days of the American republic, political thinkers have maintained that a grossly unequal division of property, wealth and power would lead to the erosion of democratic life. Yet over the past 35 years, neoconservatives and neoliberals alike have redrawn the tenets of American liberalism. Nowhere is this more evident than in our current mainstream political discourse, in which the politics of economic inequality are rarely discussed.

Download and start listening now!

The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in America (Unabridged) Listener Reviews

Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 (3.00)
5 Stars: 0
4 Stars: 0
3 Stars: 1
2 Stars: 0
1 Stars: 0
Narration: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 (0.00)
5 Stars: 0
4 Stars: 0
3 Stars: 0
2 Stars: 0
1 Stars: 0
Story: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 (0.00)
5 Stars: 0
4 Stars: 0
3 Stars: 0
2 Stars: 0
1 Stars: 0
Write a Review
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5

    " This is a good overview of the subject and a worthwhile read. However, it is overly academic in places and probably about 30% longer than it needed to be. In short: content good, writing not that good (but passable for a political scientist, I guess). "

    — jake, 3/22/2012