close
The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science Audiobook, by Natalie Angier Play Audiobook Sample

The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science Audiobook

The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science Audiobook, by Natalie Angier Play Audiobook Sample
FlexPass™ Price: $12.95
$9.95 for new members!
(Includes UNLIMITED podcast listening)
  • Love your audiobook or we'll exchange it
  • No credits to manage, just big savings
  • Unlimited podcast listening
Add to Cart
$9.95/m - cancel anytime - 
learn more
OR
Regular Price: $27.97 Add to Cart
Read By: Nike Doukas Publisher: Highbridge Audio Listen Time: at 1.0x Speed 8.83 hours at 1.5x Speed 6.63 hours at 2.0x Speed Release Date: May 2007 Format: Unabridged Audiobook ISBN: 9781598874969

Quick Stats About this Audiobook

Total Audiobook Chapters:

11

Longest Chapter Length:

74:32 minutes

Shortest Chapter Length:

69:04 minutes

Average Chapter Length:

72:46 minutes

Audiobooks by this Author:

6

Other Audiobooks Written by Natalie Angier: > View All...

Publisher Description

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Natalie Angier takes a joyride through the major scientific disciplines—physics, chemistry, biology, geology, and astronomy. Her approach is smart, funny, and sure to inspire a new appreciation of science.

Download and start listening now!

"Okay, I'll admit. I didn't finish it...yet. It is the kind of non-fiction that you can work on slowly. It made me feel good to try to understand science that is around us. It makes all the stuff you learned and forgot in high school interesting and accessible, although occasionally oversimplified."

— Flannery (4 out of 5 stars)

The Canon Listener Reviews

Overall Performance: 3.4210526315789473 out of 53.4210526315789473 out of 53.4210526315789473 out of 53.4210526315789473 out of 53.4210526315789473 out of 5 (3.42)
5 Stars: 4
4 Stars: 5
3 Stars: 7
2 Stars: 1
1 Stars: 2
Narration: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 (0.00)
5 Stars: 0
4 Stars: 0
3 Stars: 0
2 Stars: 0
1 Stars: 0
Story: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 (0.00)
5 Stars: 0
4 Stars: 0
3 Stars: 0
2 Stars: 0
1 Stars: 0
Write a Review
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Again, I honestly love the way she writes...read it again and again! "

    — Rhea, 2/3/2014
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " a pure delight and a must-read for an aspiring science writer. "

    — Amy, 1/18/2014
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Did precisely what it needed to. "

    — Delilah, 12/28/2013
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " It's informative, but Angier's writing style got on my nerves pretty quickly. As a general science primer, though, it does its job. I think it would be fun to incorporate in a class with middle or early high school-age kids. "

    — Amanda, 12/17/2013
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Natalie Angier has a gift for explaining complicated things in really simple terms. Her prose is snappy, though often verging on cutesy, and I agree with the initial argument of this book, that all the joy and wonder we derive from science as children is slowly beaten out of Americans as we age, and that's a damn shame. "

    — Lola, 12/10/2013
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " I finally buckled down and finished this book. I certainly appreciated getting a review of all of all of these topics and concepts learned (or glossed over) throughout school. It was a great refresher course. However, in her effort to make is "accessible" to the masses, she ends up going over the top, being annoyingly condescending and talking down to the reader. It is not something to be read on consecutive nights of reading, but it is a great reminder of basic scientific principles that it is important to understand. "

    — Joanna, 11/28/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " A good, light, quick review of basic science stuff. "

    — Scott, 11/24/2013
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Parts were really good, but for the most part I thought it was a little to whimiscal. Strange, most of the time I think the science books could do with more whimsy. "

    — Ed, 11/23/2013
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " There is some excellent content in this book (the sections on cells and on plate tectonics were very good) but as many others noted the authors insistence on adding supposedy clever phrases every pther paragraph was extremely annoying and really detracted from the otherwise interesting content. "

    — Mark, 11/17/2013
  • Overall Performance: 1 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " If I could give this book negative stars, I would. I had to read it for a class and it is close to the most painful thing I have ever done. "

    — Leah, 11/12/2013
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Great book for lay person wanting to know the rudiments of science. I thoroughly enjoyed it. "

    — Debbie, 7/31/2012
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Again, love Angier. I have to admit though, I had to cherry-pick this book a little; just didn't have time to read it cover to cover. I'll get back to it, though, for sure. It makes me want to learn EVERYTHING! "

    — Marilee, 5/25/2012
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " I wish I could write the way that Angier writes - she makes even the most complex ideas accessible. Love her. "

    — Jessica, 6/23/2011
  • Overall Performance: 1 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Quite interesting at first, but then it gets boring. I couldn't put myself to finish this book. "

    — Desy, 5/1/2011
  • Overall Performance: 5 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 55 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Very good book on science by a New York Times Science reporter. "

    — Debbie, 4/9/2011
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Three stars because its heart is in the right place, but did there really need to be chapter full of nothing but analogies<br/>about the size of the solar system? We got it the first, okay- admittedly the second time. :p "

    — Sara, 2/25/2011
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Loved this book. Her humor felt to me to be a little too much at times, yet i wouldn't change any of the book for the world. The kind of book you want to read with a highlighter near at hand so you can mark the parts you want to read more about later. "

    — Gloriavirtutisumbra, 2/4/2011
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " Light enough to be enjoyable, but still informative. I didn't learn a great deal about any of the disciplines covered here, but the goal was to highlight how the disciplines apply to everyday life and why the average person should care. On that goal, it mostly succeeds. "

    — Eric, 1/1/2011
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 Narration Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5 Story Rating: 0 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 50 out of 5

    " I couldn't finish this. It was interesting, but halfway through I stopped, and realized I don't want to pick it up again. It's not the subject matter, but her prose is too flowery and wandering. "

    — Julia, 11/5/2010

About Natalie Angier

Natalie Angier writes about biology for the New York Times, where she has won a Pulitzer Prize, the American Association for the Advancement of Science journalism award, and other honors. She is the author of The Beauty of the Beastly, Natural Obsessions, and Woman, named one of the best books of the year by the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, People, National Public Radio, Village Voice, and Publishers Weekly, among others.

About Nike Doukas

Nike Doukas is an actress who is most recognizable for her recurring role in Desperate Housewives. She performs regularly at South Coast Repertory in Costa Mesa, California, and has appeared several times at the Old Globe in San Diego, the Pasadena Playhouse, the Mark Taper Forum in Los Angeles, the Berkeley Repertory Theatre, and the American Conservatory Theater in San Francisco. Born in Boston, Massachusetts, she now lives in Costa Mesa.