Play Audiobook Sample
Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution Audiobook
Play Audiobook Sample
(2.98) - 223 listener ratings
Quick Stats About this Audiobook
Total Audiobook Chapters:
Longest Chapter Length:
Shortest Chapter Length:
Average Chapter Length:
Audiobooks by this Author:
Publisher Description
What did the U.S. Constitution originally mean, and how can we recover the intentions of its framers? These questions, which resound throughout today’s most heated legal and political controversies, lie at the heart of Jack N. Rakove’s splendidly readable work of historical analysis. In Original Meanings, he traces the complex weave of ideology and interests from which the Constitution emerged and shows how Americans have attached different meanings to their founding document from the moment it was published.
Original Meanings examines the classic issues that the framers of the Constitution had to solve: federalism, representation, executive power, individual rights, and the idea that the Constitution itself should become supreme law. Rakove pays particular attention to James Madison, the Constitution’s presiding genius, whose brilliance shaped the document’s framing, ratification, and amendment. The result is a major work of reinterpretation that should be read by every student of American history, law, and politics.
Download and start listening now!
"A tough book to read but well worth the time and effort. The chapters on the presidency and rights are well worth it alone. I'd recommend reading books on the constitutional conventions first to give yourself a good grounding in the arguments of the time before reading this book."
— Dan (4 out of 5 stars)
Quotes
-
“A deeply satisfying account of the political world from which the United States Constitution issued.”
— New York Times Book Review -
“With exquisite skill…Rakove convincingly demonstrates how complicated the issue of original intent really is…A first-rate historian.”
— Chicago Tribune -
“Rich, learned, and profound…fascinating reading.”
— Boston Globe -
“The most thoughtful and careful scholarly analysis to date of the extent to which the framers should control our contemporary understanding of the Constitution.”
— Stanley N. Katz, American Council of Learned Societies -
“This work ranks with well-known works by Bernard Bailyn, Gordon Wood, Bruce Ackerman, and others. Its focus on the importance of language is reason enough for placing it on one’s shelf.”
— Library Journal -
“A unique contribution to the historical and legal debate surrounding the Constitution.”
— Kirkus Reviews
Awards
-
Winner of the 1997 Pulitzer Prize for History
Original Meanings Listener Reviews
-
" I'm not sure that I fully understood everything in this book. At least I tried... "
— Brynne, 12/31/2013 -
" I read this a few years ago. It is a great read but it is really heavy non-fiction. You have to be dedicated to the subject to want to read for the content. "
— Tiffany, 11/28/2013 -
" Yawn...can't believe this was a Putlizer prize winner. "
— Greg, 9/27/2013 -
" Rakove's book is a silly attack on the Originalist theory of constitutional interpretation. Rakove's argument basically boils down to "Lawyers can't do history! History is for Historians! Whaa! Whaa! Whaa!" "
— Jeff, 2/18/2013 -
" Can't lie, it was a little dry. "
— Holly, 1/31/2013 -
" If you went to get deep into the details of the debates that surrounded the constitution and the anti-federalists vs the federalists, then this is the book for you. I found it to be a bit repetitive. "
— Andre, 12/10/2012 -
" Great sections on ratification and the bill of rights . . . everything else is a little sleepy though "
— Doug, 8/8/2012 -
" This book was sleepy and uncomfortable to read. It did have insightful sections, but unless you LOVE American history and know it very well, don't bother. "
— Dustin, 7/1/2012 -
" Important reading, but so dull. "
— Lily, 10/18/2011 -
" Very informative, but incredibly dense. The chapter on the Bill of Rights is worth chugging through the entire book to reach. "
— A., 9/22/2011 -
" Great sections on ratification and the bill of rights . . . everything else is a little sleepy though "
— doug, 3/31/2011 -
" This book was sleepy and uncomfortable to read. It did have insightful sections, but unless you LOVE American history and know it very well, don't bother. "
— Dustin, 3/22/2011 -
" Can't lie, it was a little dry. <br/> <br/> "
— Holly, 1/30/2010 -
" Rakove's book is a silly attack on the Originalist theory of constitutional interpretation. Rakove's argument basically boils down to "Lawyers can't do history! History is for Historians! Whaa! Whaa! Whaa!" "
— Jeff, 1/9/2009 -
" I read this a few years ago. It is a great read but it is really heavy non-fiction. You have to be dedicated to the subject to want to read for the content. "
— Tiffany, 1/31/2008
About Jack N. Rakove
Jack Rakove, the Coe Professor of History and American Studies and a professor of political science at Stanford University, is one of the most distinguished historians of the early American republic. He won the Pulitzer Prize in history in 1997 for Original Meanings and frequently writes op-ed articles for the New York Times, the Washington Post, and other major newspapers.
About Steven Weber
Steven Weber is an Earphones Award–winning narrator who has been a finalist for the prestigious Audie Award for Best Narration. He has been named by AudioFile magazine three times for best narration of the year. As an actor, he made his film debut in 1984 in The Flamingo Kid and has since acted in numerous films and television series, including Wings and The Shining. He has also appeared in many stage productions, including National Anthems and the Broadway musical The Producers.