close
 
  Cart (0)
  Cart (0)
 
Audiobooks > History >  General History > Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution
Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution Audiobook, by Jack N. Rakove Play Audiobook Sample

Download Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution Audiobook

3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5 (3.00) - 207 customer ratings
Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution Audiobook, by Jack N. Rakove Play Audiobook Sample
FlexPass™ Price: $13.95
$7.95 for new members!(Includes UNLIMITED podcast listening) Add to Cart learn more
OR
Regular Price: $27.95 Add to Cart
Author: Jack N. Rakove Narrator: Steven Weber Publisher: Blackstone Publishing Audio Length: Release Date: December 2010 Format: Unabridged Audiobook Delivery: Instant Download ISBN: 9781483072326
+ Add to Wish List

Publisher Description

What did the U.S. Constitution originally mean, and how can we recover the intentions of its framers? These questions, which resound throughout today’s most heated legal and political controversies, lie at the heart of Jack N. Rakove’s splendidly readable work of historical analysis. In Original Meanings, he traces the complex weave of ideology and interests from which the Constitution emerged and shows how Americans have attached different meanings to their founding document from the moment it was published.

Original Meanings examines the classic issues that the framers of the Constitution had to solve: federalism, representation, executive power, individual rights, and the idea that the Constitution itself should become supreme law. Rakove pays particular attention to James Madison, the Constitution’s presiding genius, whose brilliance shaped the document’s framing, ratification, and amendment. The result is a major work of reinterpretation that should be read by every student of American history, law, and politics.

Download and start listening now!

Quotes

  • “A deeply satisfying account of the political world from which the United States Constitution issued.”

    - New York Times Book Review

  • “With exquisite skill…Rakove convincingly demonstrates how complicated the issue of original intent really is…A first-rate historian.”

    - Chicago Tribune

  • “Rich, learned, and profound…fascinating reading.”

    - Boston Globe

  • “The most thoughtful and careful scholarly analysis to date of the extent to which the framers should control our contemporary understanding of the Constitution.”

    - Stanley N. Katz, American Council of Learned Societies

  • “This work ranks with well-known works by Bernard Bailyn, Gordon Wood, Bruce Ackerman, and others. Its focus on the importance of language is reason enough for placing it on one’s shelf.”

    - Library Journal

  • “A unique contribution to the historical and legal debate surrounding the Constitution.”

    - Kirkus Reviews

Awards

  • Winner of the 1997 Pulitzer Prize for History

Customer Reviews

Write a Review
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5

    " I'm not sure that I fully understood everything in this book. At least I tried... "

    - Brynne, 12/31/2013
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5

    " I read this a few years ago. It is a great read but it is really heavy non-fiction. You have to be dedicated to the subject to want to read for the content. "

    - Tiffany, 11/28/2013
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5

    " Yawn...can't believe this was a Putlizer prize winner. "

    - Greg, 9/27/2013
  • Overall Performance: 1 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 5

    " Rakove's book is a silly attack on the Originalist theory of constitutional interpretation. Rakove's argument basically boils down to "Lawyers can't do history! History is for Historians! Whaa! Whaa! Whaa!" "

    - Jeff, 2/18/2013
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5

    " Can't lie, it was a little dry. "

    - Holly, 1/31/2013
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5

    " If you went to get deep into the details of the debates that surrounded the constitution and the anti-federalists vs the federalists, then this is the book for you. I found it to be a bit repetitive. "

    - Andre, 12/10/2012
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5

    " Great sections on ratification and the bill of rights . . . everything else is a little sleepy though "

    - Doug, 8/8/2012
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5

    " This book was sleepy and uncomfortable to read. It did have insightful sections, but unless you LOVE American history and know it very well, don't bother. "

    - Dustin, 7/1/2012
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5

    " A tough book to read but well worth the time and effort. The chapters on the presidency and rights are well worth it alone. I'd recommend reading books on the constitutional conventions first to give yourself a good grounding in the arguments of the time before reading this book. "

    - Dan, 11/26/2011
  • Overall Performance: 1 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 5

    " Important reading, but so dull. "

    - Lily, 10/18/2011
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5

    " Very informative, but incredibly dense. The chapter on the Bill of Rights is worth chugging through the entire book to reach. "

    - A., 9/22/2011
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5

    " Great sections on ratification and the bill of rights . . . everything else is a little sleepy though "

    - doug, 3/31/2011
  • Overall Performance: 3 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 53 out of 5

    " This book was sleepy and uncomfortable to read. It did have insightful sections, but unless you LOVE American history and know it very well, don't bother. "

    - Dustin, 3/22/2011
  • Overall Performance: 2 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 52 out of 5

    " Can't lie, it was a little dry. "

    - Holly, 1/30/2010
  • Overall Performance: 1 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 51 out of 5

    " Rakove's book is a silly attack on the Originalist theory of constitutional interpretation. Rakove's argument basically boils down to "Lawyers can't do history! History is for Historians! Whaa! Whaa! Whaa!" "

    - Jeff, 1/9/2009
  • Overall Performance: 4 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 54 out of 5

    " I read this a few years ago. It is a great read but it is really heavy non-fiction. You have to be dedicated to the subject to want to read for the content. "

    - Tiffany, 1/31/2008

About the Author

Jack Rakove, the Coe Professor of History and American Studies and a professor of political science at Stanford University, is one of the most distinguished historians of the early American republic. He won the Pulitzer Prize in history in 1997 for Original Meanings and frequently writes op-ed articles for the New York Times, the Washington Post, and other major newspapers.

About the Narrator

Steven Weber is an Earphones Award–winning narrator who has been a finalist for the prestigious Audie Award for Best narration. As an actor, he made his film debut in 1984 in The Flamingo Kid and has since acted in numerous films and television series, including Wings and The Shining. He has also appeared in many stage productions, including National Anthems and the Broadway musical The Producers.