" This was the second book of Faulk's I have read, the first being Engleby which I absolutely enjoyed. I found Human Traces quite laborious to read, not just because it is very large but because it seems, at times, quite obvious and tedious. Perhaps this is partly due to the era in which it is set (late 1800s to early 1900s) and the language this subsequently calls for; and that the fact that the book is very long - but these things shouldn't matter t an engaging story. I couldn't help asking, at the end, what the point was... no real singular substantial statement seems to be made. Faulks does, however, bring up some very interesting historical, philosophical and psychological points, ideas and discussions. I almost had the sense that the fiction which all this was wrapped up in (although it is based somewhat on actual historical events) was a superlative vessel, and that the 'fact' itself was more interesting than the fabricate story. "
— Natalie, 2/9/2014