-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Very good read, not only for the back-story but the expertise in presenting technical information really made the book work. "
- Matthew, 2/14/2014
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Banks got bailed out; we got sold out! "
- Adrienne, 2/11/2014
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Don't bother. The title says it all. Through vested interests and protecting their own turf the government didn't do a great job on the bailout. No real new insights and a plodding style. There are other much better books on how the US dug itself a massive hole and then when supposedly trying to fix it just made it deeper. "
- Michael, 2/11/2014
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Yet another tale of woe and banks. "
- Samuel, 1/26/2014
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" A good analysis of the bailout from the perspective of the TARP inspector general. No big surprises or revelations, but an easily readable account of the bailouts starting in 2008. "
- AllInStride, 1/15/2014
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Neil Barofsky, Former Inspector General of TARP, has written a piercing memoir about the naked collusion between Washington and Wall Street. As IG, Barofsky's role was to ensure that the $700 billion in bailout funds was spent properly, and to identify and prosecute any fraud discovered in its distribution. Rather than receive assistance from Treasury in his task, he recounts a shocking litany of examples in which taxpayer funds intended to provide relief to homeowners and borrowers were quietly stolen by the Department of Treasury and placed into the pockets of the very financial institutions which had caused the crisis in the first place. Prior to taking the helm as TARP IG, Barofsky was a US district attorney in New York who prosecuted narcoterrorists. His lack of interest in a pursuing a political career allowed him to focus on the job at-hand without worrying about the personal ramifications. In meeting with other inspector generals, he quickly learned just how rare this was. Barofsky recalls an early meeting with other IGs at the start of his tenure at TARP:
"...as I was walking out of the meeting, another IG commented on my most recent public fracas and said, "I wish I could do the same thing, but I've got kids in college. I need this job." (p. 54)
Barofsky soon learned that the entire financial regulatory apparatus in Washington had been carefully designed to benefit the banks-- the very institutions they were meant to monitor. As Neel Kashkari, assistant secretary at Treasury, warned him:
'"The banks view you as the TARP special prosecutor. They're terrified of you. They view their regulators differently. They know them. They trust the regulator who is on site all week with them. You are a lot different than the guy who has a beer with them every Friday night." Unbelievable, I thought. [Kashkari] actually seemed to be arguing that the banks' comfort with their thoroughly captured regulators was a good thing.' (p.100)
Such comments comport with others made in recent months by other financial regulators, such as Kathryn S. Wylde, board member of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York:
'"Wall Street is our Main Street-- love ’em or hate ’em. They are important and we have to make sure we are doing everything we can to support them unless they are doing something indefensible."'
Barofsky outlines numerous instances in which Treasury blocked his office from reviewing documents, issuing subpoenas to wrongdoers, and threatened him with retaliation if he informed Congress of illegal uses of TARP funds. Treasury also threatened members of the press with restricted access if they ran stories critical of how TARP funds were being spent, and partnered regularly with the Obama White House to attack Barofsky's team through unattributed Op-Ed pieces in the Washington Post. Barofsky found himself placed in the strange position of relying upon Republican senators to protect him, even though he was a Democrat who had looked forward to the incoming Obama administration. Far from merely allowing taxpayer funds to illegally flow into the pockets of Wall Street banks, Obama's administration actively worked to steamroll the TARP IG's office, throwing its full weight behind Secretary of Treasury Geithner, whose capture by Wall Street is documented in devastating detail.
In one passage, Geithner shrugs off the fact that HAMP-- the program intended to provide homeowners temporary relief by allowing them to refinance --had failed to make a difference in the foreclosure rate. Barofsky's office had warned Treasury early on that the program was designed to fail because it created financial incentives for mortgage services to drag the process on for underwater borrowers, collecting fees all the while, only to abandon the process and hit the homeowner with huge final bills in the end. Geither explained that despite these problems, the banks would be fine, stating: "We estimate they can handle ten million foreclosures, over time. This program will help foam the runway for them." Barofsky reflects:
'A lightbulb went on for me. Elizabeth [Warren, chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel] had been challenging Geithner on how the program was going to help home owners, and he had responded by citing how it would help the banks. Geither apparently looked at HAMP as an aid to the banks, keeping the full flush of foreclosures from hitting the financial system all at the same time... So HAMP would "foam the runway" by stretching out the foreclosures, giving the banks more time to absorb losses while the other parts of the bailouts juiced bank profits that could then fill the capital holes created by housing losses. HAMP was not separate from the bank bailouts; it was an essential part of them." (p. 157)
Barofsky also explains why the much-touted Dodd-Frank bill makes the financial system more dangerous by allowing banks to grow larger while retaining smaller capital cushions. The piece of legislation which would have actually ended too-big-to-fail was the Brown-Kaufman amendment, which would have forced the biggest banks to become smaller. It was killed by Timothy Geithner and his Democratic allies on the Hill, leaving only Dodd-Frank left to contend with. Rather than seriously attempt to break up the banks, Dodd-Frank reposed tremendous discretionary powers upon-- you guessed it --the Treasury Secretary in deciding whether a bank was large enough to pose a risk to the economy. Barofsky sums up: "Dodd-Frank didn't change the postcrisis status quo of the too-big-to-fail banks; it cemented it." (p. 220)
Barofsky artfully lays out many other examples of financial misconduct by Treasury and its allies in Congress and the White House, including the AIG bonuses, the auto industry bailout, and more. By quietly building his case with the calm, logical demeanor of a prosecutor, he has created a damning portrait of a government utterly in the pocket of the very banks it was meant to regulate. While the political parties lob social issues over the net at each other, cheered on by their respective fanbases, few observe the reality: there is only one political party, and its sole client is Wall Street. "
- Sagar, 1/15/2014
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Loved this book. Borofsky is a hero. He sometimes gets convoluted, but he really details how the administration - and Tim Geithner in particular - blundered in overcoming the housing crisis. "
- Carrie, 1/9/2014
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" A fine mixture of anger and laughter. If you really want to find out how our financial system and government work - this is THE book to read. "
- William, 12/23/2013
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Ouch. If there's one thing that comes through, it's that bankers view banks not as just corporate persons, but as the true citizens of the US. It's a very clear book on what goes on inside the Beltway. "
- Will, 12/18/2013
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Really excellent book on the financial crises and at the same time a good story. Financial instruments are explained well but explanations are in laymen terms. Good read and a good story. "
- Alaric, 12/1/2013
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Great insights from someone in the trenches. Sometimes drifted too far into govt acronym-ese but intense and a maddening account. "
- Jonathan, 5/30/2013
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Would have been 5 stars if Barofsky had cut down on the gloating and focus on the pedigree of people he worked with. Vivid lesson in public choice economics. "
- Cortney, 5/2/2013
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" This is an easy to read account of the financial meltdown and the continued control of the government by Wall Street. Don't read it if you don't want to be ticked off. "
- Jerry, 2/2/2013
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" Barofsky, the former Inspector General for the TARP tells an infuriating but interesting story about his stint watchdogging the TARP fund. His narrative of events is never dry or boring--it flows. I love the inside scoop on butting heads with the Treasury Department. "
- Beth, 1/7/2013
-
Overall Performance:
Narration Rating:
Story Rating:
" I thought I knew the truth. I didn't know anything until I read this book. I am a huge stickler for citing sources and Barofsky did that in spades. Every American should read this book before November. The two big parties continue to perpetuate the mess they helped create. "
- Mia, 12/2/2012
> Hide All