" The most interesting parts of this book were the sections on the professions and "interdisciplinarity" (which I run into a lot in my clients' work - it has replaced "post-structualist" as the buzzword du jour in academe) and Part 4 about why professors seem to think the same way. In my work as an editor of dissertations and scholarly articles (with the occasional PhD application essay thrown in there), I hear a lot of horror stories about doctoral candidates forced to stay in their programs for years beyond when they should be finished or just let go from the program. Menand's point about the self-interestedness of departments in keeping ABD's and doctoral candidates going was very well taken, though I disagree that PhDs should be easier to get, having seen the rigor-less pablum that sometimes passes for dissertation research. I have read probably over 100 dissertations in all types of subject matter in the eight years I've been editing professionally, and I would say a good percentage of them (maybe 15-20%) are just trash, but they get passed because the candidate is doing research that his or her advisor is interested in or wants to appropriate for his or her own purposes or that somehow justifies the committee's political or social beliefs. Few solutions are offered, but I think anyone going into a graduate program, whether in the humanities or any of the social or "hard" sciences, would do well to read this little book and think about what he or she hopes to accomplish. "
— Villate, 1/2/2014