The Cold War Audiobook

" In November 1950 the United Nations coalition, consisting mostly of the United States Army and the South Korean army, had almost won the Korean war, occupying most of North Korea. However, since October hundreds of thousands of Chinese "volunteers" had been crossing the Yalu River, and in November they started attacking the United Nations positions and pushing the United Nations troops south. At a press conference on November 30, 1950, President Truman said that he did not rule out using the atomic bomb against Chinese troops. So on December the 2nd, five Hiroshima-sized bombs were dropped on Chinese troop formations. A United States veto prevented the United Nations Security Council from undoing the authorization of involvement in the Korean conflict. Pressured by their Chinese ally, the Soviet Union gave the United States an ultimatum: stop all military operations on the peninsula within 48 hours, or face the severest consequences. When the deadline passed, two bombers took off from Vladivostok and dropped atomic bombs on the port cities of Pusan and Inchon. On General MacArthur's orders, the next bombs fell on Vladivostok, Shenyang and Harbin; as Western European countries were withdrawing from NATO, mushroom clouds appeared over Hamburg and Frankfurt. Now, only the first half of this paragraph took place in our timeline, but the second part could very well have. During the missile era, a nuclear war could have started during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 and during the Able Archer exercise of 1983, which Richard Rhodes also wrote about. So whatever harm came out of the Cold War, things could've been much, much worse. This is an America-centric history of the Cold War that devotes several pages to Watergate, and only mentions Guatemala in passing because of the U.S. involvement in the coup that overthrew the country's leftist government in 1954, which supposedly radicalized Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. Nowhere does it say that the coup was followed by a 40-year civil war where 140 thousand to 250 thousand people were killed. El Salvador is not even in the index. In the Third World, the Cold War was quite hot, and I wouldn't be surprised if more people were killed in the Cold War-related hot wars that would've been in the nuclear exchange of December 1950 - but this book doesn't even ask this question. The basic narrative is familiar to all educated adults: the wartime coalition breaking up, the coup in Czechoslovakia, the formation of NATO and so on until the age of Gorbachev, Yeltsin and George H. W. Bush - but perhaps not to the Yale undergraduates the author teaches. "

" A great read and entry into the subject. Gaddis can tell a story, and it stoked my interest in the subject some years ago. "

" History of our times is subject to the interpretation of the author. I found this highly iinformative, well written and organized and a good take on events in my lifetime. "

" Every man, woman, and child should read this book. "

" Enjoying this book, does a great job linking events during the 1940's into the 1970's that I knew about, had lived thru, but didn't understand the interconnections. "

" Meh. I expected so much more. This is NOT a "new" history. It is the same old stuff, and he does little to include new studies, like those in the field of environmental history. His optimistic conclusion and pro-American undertones are nauseating. "

" After world war II, there were basically two big geopolitical powers left to divided up the world. "

" I can't really picture what a better compact Cold War history would be like. "

" Amazing. The best book I've read on this topic in general. I cried once or twice while reading it. Very cool. "

" Short but very interesting account of the Cold War - for a US perspective eve "

" I love this book so much. "

" I became interested in the Cold War while writing my master's thesis. This provides a good overview of the causes and players. "

" Concise without loosing the important facts of the Cold War. "

" Very nicely written with many interesting insights as to the thought processes of world leaders during a frightful period of history. "

" Great overall coverage of the topic. Very much in the vein of "popular history". "

" To be expected of a book only 260 pages long but I feel it glossed too much. Still enjoyable though. Need to find a more in depth one now. "

" Caveat- listened to this book via Audible. As an audiobook, it does not work great. You must have an immaculate attention span and never break focus for so much as a moment, otherwise you'll be saying to yourself, "Wait, Breshnev again? I thought we'd moved on to Gorby. Damn it." "

" A very readable volume of the Cold War. Not overly "academic", nor "pedestrian". "

" Every man, woman, and child should read this book. "

" Exactly what I was hoping for. Wish I could give this 4.5 stars "

" A serviceable if somewhat pedestrian survey of the cold war. "

" Excellent book and easy to read. "

" An engaging distillation of a conflict I (sadly, terrifyingly, pick one) never learned much about in school. "

" Filled in some blanks, the part about Nixon is especially relevant today "

" Enjoying this book, does a great job linking events during the 1940's into the 1970's that I knew about, had lived thru, but didn't understand the interconnections. "

" A great book by a well known Cold War historian who does an excellent job of educating people with a clear, concise account of the events that merely led us to the brink of Nuclear catastrophe and the fall of the U.S.S.R "

" a nice, relatively simple explanation of the basic events of the Cold War. I don't know if I agree with the depiction of Reagan as a hero, but I appreciated the simplicity of the book as many history books get too self-involved. I learned a lot about our country's history "

" I love this book so much. "